Archive for April, 2009

A final thought

The internet doesn’t really exist – at least not as a distinct culture. It’s just people exchanging thoughts, information, good and services, as we’ve always done. It’s never going to be anything but a perfect mirror of what we are individually and collectively. It’s not going to change us, make us better, more charitable, more honest, more courageous or compassionate. The internet is not “rewiring our brains”. It’s not going to make our lives more exciting or interesting or satisfying. There’s no evidence that it’s made us any happier or unhappier. It’s not going to redefine privacy, or identity, or copyright or ownership.

The internet is not going to do away with national borders or poverty or tyranny or censorship. There was a famous adage which bravely proclaimed that ”the internet treats censorship as a malfunction and routes around it”. But the CEO’s of Google, Yahoo and Microsoft saw censorship as an opportunity and they leapt at it, like a Wall Street banker would leap in front of a subway train if you tossed a dollar bill onto the tracks. It was the “cost of doing business in China”. The internet never has and never will stop the firing of  so much as a single bullet. Ask the residents of Burma, the first national insurrection to have a global online audience of concerned spectators. No new tool or technology is ever going to accomplish revolutionary – or even evolutionary – change  for us because everything we create can only be a projection of our fundamental characters and natures. That’s as inevitable as the laws of thermodynamics. I think it’s going to apply to the artificial entities we create later this century as well.

Our creations may be fascinating and superficially exciting. They may make certain aspects of our lives more convenient, but they’re never going to change who we are  in any meaningful way. We can change our natures, improve ourselves and strive to create a better society. But as always, we still have to do that ourselves. That’s the real meat of science fiction for me – it’s not about technology changing us, it’s about us having the vision to change who and what we are. A future in which every child can read, in which poverty doesn’t exist and no one ever goes to bed cold and hungry, a future of universal equality and opportunity and liberty – THAT is science fiction to me, much more “out there” than a future of warp drives or mind uploads, hyperlongevity or “spiritual machines”.

That future is just as achievable as any technological utopia. But no technology is going to get us there any faster. Not by so much as a single day. I think it’s even dangerous to assign hope in technology to facilitate an evolutionary role for us because that hope ultimately diminishes our sense of personal responsibility in creating a better world- a responsibility we will never be able to escape no matter how far our technology and our ability to “connect” with each other develops.

Anyway, I hope you’ve enjoyed reading this blog. If you’re interested you can look me up on Facebook, where I’m spending most of my online time these days. ( Do a search for “Chris Wren, Ajijic”) I’d love to hear from you!

Are blogs dying/dead?

Oh, probably. Or not. Who cares? Why must we continually ask these sorts of questions? Why are we so obsessively curious about what media other people consume or create?  I think it would be stating the obvious ( this  blog’s particular speciality) to say that young people use social networking tools more than they blog and people who think blogs are the NEXT BIG THING are generally squares my age or older.

And that’s the only aspect that would interest me about the question of whether blogs are dead or not. The irony of a younger generation looking on blogs as “old  media” is just so delicious, it’s heavenly. After a decade of relentless, obnoxious, triumphant crowing from the likes of Andrew Sullivan, Ann Althouse, Jeff Jarvis, Glenn Reynolds and the rest of the “Army of Davids”  brat pack – for them to be seen by generations Y and Z  as old-fashioned and frumpy as bloggers themselves consider newspapers – now THAT’s my definition of sweet!

But really, the entire question is just silly. It takes a particularly banal mind to think that each new development must necessarily displace the thing that came before. In other words, social networking is about as likely to kill off blogs as photography did away with painting. And to Glenn Reynolds and the Army of Davids political blogger crowd – I can assure you, the reason newspapers are having trouble is most certainly not because people are reading YOUR blogs.

Two weeks without Battlestar Galactica

God, I’m so glad that show is gone. Scifi can finally become scifi again, and leave the Left Behind/Touched by an Angel shit in the vast unmarked grave of  Televisions self-indulgent wankfests. I’ve spent the last two weeks arguing with people about the relative merits of Ron Moore’s ham-fisted grade 10-level religious melodrama and my mind hasn’t changed. However well the show started off, it ended up being the worst thing to happen to scifi television since The Great Vegetable Rebellion.